The Importance of Pressing in Modern Football
The
Importance of Pressing in Modern Football – Why the English Game Must
Keep Up
As football’s ever-evolving state enters a new phase, pressing
has quickly become one of the most recognised pieces of the tactical jigsaw.
The pursuit of tiki-taka football, mastered by Pep Guardiola’s Barcelona side
of 2008-2011, is on the decline, whilst styles of football such as the ones
implemented by Jurgen Klopp at Borussia Dortmund and Diego Simeone at Atletico
Madrid are on the rise.
The three aforementioned styles are distinctly different, yet
all of them have enforced a successful style of pressing. All three teams
employed counterpressing, an approach based on winning the ball back high up
the pitch as soon as it is lost, to great effect. Differences in each style of
play are clear to see: Barca favoured a possesion-oriented game, whilst Atletico
show near-refusal to keep the ball, and Dortmund base their play on
penetration. A chunk of each side’s success is down to their well designed
pressing methods.
Types of pressing
There are various types of pressing in the world of football;
some are common, some are sparse, some are effective, some are
self-destructive, and some are down to an outright lack of design.
CONSTANT PRESSING
The idea of constant pressing is
self-explanatory; the team presses constantly when out of possession of the
ball. Like any other method, it has its strengths and weaknesses. It is rare to
come across a team that uses this style purely because of the excessive
physical demands it requires. Players are often left lying on the floor in
exhaustion after implementing the system in a competitive match, take Athletic
Bilbao’s match vs Barcelona as an example.
Its effectiveness comes against teams who lack confidence and
technical ability on the ball. If a player is uncomfortable on the ball in the
first place, they will be quaking in their boots when they see a hungry pack of
players who are eager to win the ball running at them. The thought of constant
pressing, to some, is akin to singular pressing except in numbers; players
running like headless chickens towards whichever part of the pitch the ball is
in. This can happen, although it would be largely unsuccessful. Another point
is that this pressing system requires man-marking to be truly effective. It
simply would not work with zonal marking as opposition overloads of certain
zones would undermine the system.
However, Marcelo Bielsa’s teams, for example, have used the
system well by being precise. His players are not made to all run after the
ball, but to anticipate where the next pass will be and to arrive before it has
gone. Bielsa, nicknamed El Loco for his unconventional methods, has always kept
his tactical set up the same, with the shape being structured by two
principles: keeping a spare man at the back, and having 4 forwards. The reason
for the spare man at the back is to compensate for opposition counter-attacks,
i.e. 3 defenders vs 2 forwards or 2 defenders vs 1 forward. Key to his pressing
style is the use of 4 forwards, consisting of 1 striker, 2 wingers and an
attacking midfielder, which is never altered.
To read more on Bielsa, read
@chalkontheboots’ excellent breakdown of his methods –Marcelo Bielsa – Method in the Madness.
The greatest example of constant pressing can be watched here,
implemented, yet again, by Bielsa.
SINGULAR PRESSING
This form of pressing is arguably prevalent in the English game.
It involves one man pressing solely whilst his teammates watch, running like a
man possessed, following the ball in every direction, usually as a result of
frustration or anger, and usually to no avail. Think Wayne Rooney: a couple of
years back he was hailed for his ‘high work rate’ and how he harried defenders.
Last season, Danny Welbeck got the nod ahead of him to play against Real Madrid
because of Rooney’s unwillingness to mark their deep lying playmaker Xabi
Alonso. So, has Rooney stopped his child-like energetic chasing of the ball?
No. What is the problem, then? The problem is that he shouldn’t be doing it in
the first place.
By chasing the ball on his own, he would be breaking from the
tactical plan. The plan was to stay compact as a unit against Madrid, but
Rooney’s lack of patience often means he goes chasing the ball because his side
are not in possession, so was dropped for the game. Another reason is his
laziness in terms of transitioning quickly from attack to defence, in this case
a deep shape.
However, Rooney is not the only player to do it. It is
commonplace in the English game (albeit more common in the lower leagues) for a
lone striker who has grown in frustration from not getting the ball enough to
lose his rag and eventually crack; sprinting at full speed to the ball, only to
be ridiculed by a simple pass. It allows teams who play a deep lying playmaker,
a la Real Madrid, to utilise them and start attacks because the headless
chicken of a striker has gone missing. It is no wonder that this is the least
effective pressing system as it is highly likely that it is a result of a lack
of coaching of pressing.
COUNTERPRESSING
This style of pressing, as mentioned above, has been used
successfully by Barcelona, Borussia Dortmund and Atletico Madrid. It was also
used by Bayern Munich under Heynckes in the last season under his reign, taking
inspiration from Dortmund.
It is the idea that the best time to seek to regain possession
is when it is first lost, usually in the opponent’s half, because the opponent
is at their most disorientated and if won, the distance to the opposition’s
goal is shorter. The opposition are trying to get the ball under control, which
requires high concentration, and will feel under even more mental pressure if
they are being pressed. The system is organised, and the whole team moves as a
unit to squeeze the play. One player will press the player on the ball, whilst
others look to cut off any available passes, and the defence will move up in
unison with the pressers to make the pitch compact. As more players are higher
up the pitch as a result of the pressing positions, a quick attack with
numerous players can occur, which is always a danger.
If the ball is not won as a result of the counterpress or if
certain triggers to press do not arise, the players transition quickly into
their defensive shape. There are various triggers: the opponent is facing their
own goal or the opponent is facing the touchline, and the team is organised
enough to start the press (e.g. counterpressing should not be used if 5 players
are ahead of the ball and there are various passing options available for the
opposition). The pressing triggers from standard pressing can also be used,
which I will outline later.
The beauty of this system is that if the counterpress regains
possession, the team can start a counter-attack from high up the pitch when the
opposition is unbalanced, which gives a higher probability of success for the counter-attack.
And if the ball is not won from the counterpress, the players get back into
their defensive shape and employ a standard pressing system. I will explain the
standard pressing system in the next section of the article.
This picture
from Spielverlagerung, and the article itself, shows how Bayern put
counterpressing into practice:

The outcome of this situation was that Martinez poked the ball
from behind, dispossessing his opponent, towards Ribery, allowing him to pass
to Schweinsteiger who could then start a counter attack.
It should be noted that, in my opinion, counterpressing is not
specifically used numerous teams because: a) the system requires a lot of
training and design, b) it requires high concentration over a long period of
time in matches, c) transitions from defence to attack and vice-versa have to
be quick to be effective.
STANDARD PRESSING
Probably the most commonly used pressing system in football,
standard pressing (I wonder how I came up with that name) has the ability to be
effective without substantial amounts of effort. However, it is unsurprisingly
most effective when high concentration, high levels of training and good design
are applied.
It is the idea of pressing only when in the designated defensive
shape when triggers occur. Standard pressing usually as a consequence of
design, particularly in European football, but is sometimes applied
unconsciously, usually in English football. It is probably the second most
common type of pressing in England. Triggers include, from the opponent: a
loose touch, an underweighted pass, or a pass into a congested area (e.g.
centre of the pitch).
Here is an example (excuse poor editing as Paint was used):
Dortmund are in their defensive shape of 4-4-1-1 (striker not on
screen), whilst a pass is being played across midfield.
The pass is overweighted and the Nurnberg player fails to
control the ball, triggering Dortmund to press the ball.
The Dortmund Player (Reus in this case) wins the ball as a
result of successful standard pressing and is able to start a counter attack.
The counter attack resulted in a corner for Dortmund.
Conclusion
The rise of double pivots and modern day centre-halves in
continental football means that if the English game doesn’t progress with the
times, it will fall behind its footballing counterparts because of the sheer
speed of which attacks are assembled at in modern football.
Managers should have an effective pressing strategy in mind and
should implement such strategies, as a result of design and practice, on the
pitch. Effective pressing systems are seen more commonly in top footballing
nations such as Germany, Spain & Italy, and it is no coincidence that these
countries often perform excellently on the continental and international
stages, whilst England fall behind. The art of pressing should be taught from
an early age so that it is second nature to players who rise through the
system. Of course coaches’ preferences will differ, but that promotes
versatility, an invaluable asset that is growing in importance as the game
evolves and demands players to be able to play in a number of positions and
roles.
After all; if you don’t have the ball, you can’t score.
0 comments: